<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus 1030 SW Review &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/</link>
	<description>Photography, Technology And Travel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:50:26 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timchristie.com/?p=95#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Yoda to tell the truth I havent used the olympus that much at night but as a start I would suggest that first and foremost use a tripod that will help to reduce most of your blur. Secondly you could try one of the scene modes. There are some night ones there that might help improve your night photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yoda to tell the truth I havent used the olympus that much at night but as a start I would suggest that first and foremost use a tripod that will help to reduce most of your blur. Secondly you could try one of the scene modes. There are some night ones there that might help improve your night photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoda</title>
		<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>yoda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timchristie.com/?p=95#comment-318</guid>
		<description>hey im just wondering wats the best set up for night shots. struggling with a good set up they all come out blurry. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey im just wondering wats the best set up for night shots. struggling with a good set up they all come out blurry. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonzalo</title>
		<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonzalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timchristie.com/?p=95#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I really want to buy that camera, but first i wanna preffer to have some pictures in high resolution, too see how good is it for me. So, could you send me some pictures to my e-mail adress ?

Best whishes

gOnza,

Argentinaa -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really want to buy that camera, but first i wanna preffer to have some pictures in high resolution, too see how good is it for me. So, could you send me some pictures to my e-mail adress ?</p>
<p>Best whishes</p>
<p>gOnza,</p>
<p>Argentinaa -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timchristie.com/?p=95#comment-295</guid>
		<description>I am really happy with the majority of the photos it produces, there are just some situations that produce substandard images. Only those of us that look at photos on a pixel  by pixel basis will really notice whats going on.

No post processing on the images. just a straight resize for the web. The levels could do with a minor tweak but for the purposes of this article I just posted them straight out of the camera. 

Levels wise it is fairly accurate with good shadow detail and not too many blown highlights if you watch your settings. There is plenty of room to tweak if you need a bit of extra punch from the photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really happy with the majority of the photos it produces, there are just some situations that produce substandard images. Only those of us that look at photos on a pixel  by pixel basis will really notice whats going on.</p>
<p>No post processing on the images. just a straight resize for the web. The levels could do with a minor tweak but for the purposes of this article I just posted them straight out of the camera. </p>
<p>Levels wise it is fairly accurate with good shadow detail and not too many blown highlights if you watch your settings. There is plenty of room to tweak if you need a bit of extra punch from the photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Packer</title>
		<link>http://www.timchristie.com/olympus-1030-sw-review-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Packer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timchristie.com/?p=95#comment-293</guid>
		<description>I think the noise problem is pretty indicative of compact point and shoot cameras. We have had similar experiences with our Canon Ixus 75, but for daylight point and click situations it&#039;s pretty awesome. 

Those images are pretty tack sharp, you do any post on them or are they resized and from camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the noise problem is pretty indicative of compact point and shoot cameras. We have had similar experiences with our Canon Ixus 75, but for daylight point and click situations it&#8217;s pretty awesome. </p>
<p>Those images are pretty tack sharp, you do any post on them or are they resized and from camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->
